Strategy of Sealing Names in Grand Jury Indictment
What could be the reason Fitzgerald has sealed both parties in the indictments?
There may be a strategy involved.
Note: This is just speculation.
Let's consider a potential strategy for sealing both names. Under rule 603, a grand jury can return an indictment against an official, and this would trigger the House to examine the indictment, then vote whether to investigate and/or impeachment.
The ruse would be to seal both names this time, even though there is no actual change. When the public learns there has been no change, should Fitzgerald seal both names again (even though there might be a real change, and list the Grand Jury, not the US as the party), the public will have no indication of Grand Jury charges against the President or Vice President.
In a broad sense, recall the response the special prosecutor gave when asked about his new website. The way the staff responded was as if there were just a few loose ends. Little did we realize that there were indictments, further investigations, and more case filings. The same could be happening now.
Rather than tip their hands in the future over what could be a grand jury indictment or motion against a specific party (as opposed to a motion by the US government), Fitzgerald may want to do something now that will not top what the Grand Jury may be doing.
Here's what could be happening:
Points
Here are several points related to what may be happening. Note, the points overlap and you will notice they tend to repeat themselves:
Discussion
Let's consider the details. On the issue of sealing both names, Fitzgerald's thinking could be along these lines: [a] If he wants to muddy the waters on a potential Grand Jury indictment [in Grand Jury V. ___ format], he may have done the opposite in this round, and sealed both parties, even though it is, as usual, US v. ____. [b] When the format is publicly revealed [that it is actually US v. ____], watchers may think, "Oh nothing has changed."
In the future, should Fitzgerald hope to invoke 603 and the Grand Jury as a party, the next indictment may again seal both names (Grand Jury v. Cheney/Bush); by sealing both parties this time (where there is no real grand jury as a party) and then by subsequently revealing the US, not the Grand Jury is a party, the public will think that he's simply sealing the parties, without the desire to hide the Grand Jury Connection to either the VP or President.
This would prevent the Grand Jury from signaling to any Member of Congress or voter what could be happening (that the other party is not the US, but actually the grand jury, invoking 603) and otherwise affect the November election.
However, if this is true, the question would be: "Why didn't he do this with Libby, and seal both then?" A response could be that perhaps Fitzgerald and the Grand Jury didn't know about 603 until after the Libby indictment was already sealed.
Firey Dogs--t Laketurdblossom
The word is spreading on FDL cult. FDL visitors looking for more free time chasing sparrows.
Love,
JP Fans, and other former fans of the demented family.
P. S. Have you taken your medication, Jane?
<< Home