ABA, Legal System: American Cess Pool
Ever since 9-11, things have been rather strange in America. The legal community has basically sat on their rear end doing nothing.
It's time take away the professional credentials of those like Wendy who were there, spewing forth non-sense.
You'd think that a legal community would exercise some leadership. If there was a national issue, the ABA "should" be there to make sure the laws are asserted, and power is restrained. They took an oath.
But it didn't work that way. It was as if after 9-11, the idiots in the legal community gladly gave the President "whatever he wanted."
Then when it comes to figuring out what happened, or how this mess is to be resolved, the legal community is there spinning, "This is what is best."
What a crock.
Unprofessional conduct
How bad does the American legal community have to get, to warrant disbarment:
Some of you think that nothing can be done. But look at Article 82 of the Geneva Conventions. It clearly imposes a legal requirement on attorneys to ensure that the laws of war are enforced, and that Geneva is well known.
Art 82. Legal advisers in armed forces
The High Contracting Parties at all times, and the Parties to the conflict in time of armed conflict, shall ensure that legal advisers are available, when necessary, to advise military commanders at the appropriate level on the application of the Conventions and this Protocol and on the appropriate instruction to be given to the armed forces on this subject. (Legal Advisor responsibility.)
To summarize:
Let's consider the recent Congressional direction, and DoD "plan" not to provide the Geneva Convention to interrogators.
This "plan" directly contradicts the Geneva requirements:
Art 83. Dissemination
1. The High Contracting Parties undertake, in time of peace as in time of armed conflict, to disseminate the Conventions and this Protocol as widely as possible in their respective countries and, in particular, to include the study thereof in their programmes of military instruction and to encourage the study thereof by the civilian population, so that those instruments may become known to the armed forces and to the civilian population.Ref
This means that it is clear:
Consider the reprisals against the Iraqi civilians. This is illegal.
Article 51: Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited.
Article 52: Civilian objects shall not be the object of attack or of reprisals.
. . .
Article 52.3 In case of doubt whether an object which is normally dedicated to civilian purposes, such as a place of worship, a house or other dwelling or a school, is being used to make an effective contribution to military action, it shall be presumed not to be so used.
Article 57: No provision of this article may be construed as authorizing any attacks against the civilian population, civilians or civilian objects.
Ref
Protocol I from 1977 has not been ratified by the US Senate.
The ABA imposes on attorneys the obligation to report conduct that is illegal, violates the law, or is contrary to the Supreme Law of the land.
Someone knows, and there are many attorneys in the ABA who have, or should have, some explaining to do:
Here are the protections given to all belligerents, and the phony "illegal combatant" is a fabricated word:
ARTICLE 82.
The provisions of the present Convention must be respected by the High Contracting Parties under all circumstances.
In case, in time of war, one of the belligerents is not a party to the Convention, its provisions shall nevertheless remain in force as between the belligerents who are parties thereto. Ref
This means that the status of the detainees is completely unrelated to how the US defines them. The treaty, not the "good graces of the reckless ABA," is what protects them.
Here's what we know:
There were specific conversations occurring between the DoJ legal teams, DoD, NSA, and other general counsels in government.
Addington, Wendy, and other attorneys were there, involved, and should have been aware of what was going on. What's the plan to do some serious review of these arguably reckless DoJ legal conduct; and compare the professional standards of conduct to the results:
It's one thing to point fingers at other nations, or the so called "detainees." The problem this legal community has is, despite the well known "lack of Taliban-related prisoners at Guantanamo", there's no bonafide case to be made that the laws of war have been enforced, followed, or adequately advised.
Article 82 imposes a legal duty on the legal profession, not just individual attorneys, to ensure that the laws of war are followed, adequately advised.
The results are clear:
It's time to turn the spotlight on the ABA and the specific by-name attorneys who were involved:
They have some explaining to do:
Someone inside DoJ and DoD has crated this legislation that permits the US Army to issue a guidebook that assent to a lower standard. There's an attorney on some staff that knows, or should know better.
The rules are already there. This legal crew invents legal non-sense to say the rules don't apply, they aren’t responsible. Fine, then the public should lawfully reciprocate: Lawfully target them by monitoring what they're saying, what legal advice they're giving, and then present it to Congress to show there is a problem:
Go down the list, and you'll see what idiots they have. Look at their legal arguments. Review where we are.
It's clear the situation is a mess. We can blame one profession: The legal community.
Time after time, the American public has been force fed a load of non-sense. Treaties, statutes, rights have been explained away as "quaint."
I've personally had enough of this non-sense. What's amazing is that Americans are merely "lamenting" and "talking about' what "might happen" if they win the election.
Wow, despite the pervasive abuses, there are people inside the RNC who have looked at the voting, and think they can win. Amazing.
Let's put aside the issue of reality, and focus on the real issue: Despite the pervasive abuses, there are people still breathing in America who want this abuse to continue, and will vote for this.
You can whine all day long about the technical capabilities of the voting box, but until you get off your rear end and mobilize voters to wake up, and vote to protect this Constitution -- by voting for the DNC -- you're wasting your time blogging.
It's all well and good for bloggers to plead for contributions. What a load. Spend your time solving problems, rallying voters, and getting off your ass.
I don't want to hear your B.S.-story. Either you're going to focus on the Constitution, or you're going to be in the way.
Whine all you want about what happened in Ohio. It happened. The time is now to mobilize the voters, get them to vote, and focus on what is to be done to solve what is going to happen again: More voting fraud.
if this means having more independent examiners, do that.
If this means you have to set up teams that patrol the voting lines, do that.
Whatever it is that will solve this intimidation-tampering-registration problem, do that.
The legal community needs to do a better job at providing the leadership. Each time, each election, each bill that appears before Congress is another opportunity to assert your values: The Constitution.
Yet for the life of me I have yet to understand what the legal community in America and the American Bar Association can do to explain themselves.
Look at the utter non=sense we've been given from the legal profession:
The common problem is that there are lawyers who are paid to defy their oath. The ABA needs to get hauled before Congress:
Hay, it was your oath, your system, and your oversight plan. You can either solve it, or the American public should be offered a competing legal system, one where the "other bar association" can show it does better than the non-sense we've got from the ABA.
You only have one legal system. Americans have options. We can vote for new leaders.
But when Americans, despite the abuse, continue to vote for what is unconstitutional, that does not mean that it is legal.
If you want to parade your profession and legal system as the "world model," you've utterly let down the world. You can do better.
The world doesn't need to give Americans any incentives. The only incentive Americans have is to assert their right, to do what is right, to remain free.
Yet, Americans are willing to let the legal community water down the Constitution, spew forth legal non-sense, and do nothing about it.
That is wrong.
IF America is going to assert that it has some "fabulous system" then let's see some fabulous results.
The utter non-sense we've been given from Addington, Gonzalez, Viet Dinh, Yoo, and the rest of the legal-idiots in America has sent a clear signal: America talks about one thing, but it's legal community is willing to do the opposite.
There is no reason Americans should have confidence in the legal system, especially when despite the many abuses, the legal community refuses to provide leadership to protect the Constitution.
As always, this will be left to the American public: To provide the oversight of the very profession that would have Americans believe, "We're here to help."
What a load of non-sense. This American Bar Association has given us utter crap. For too long we've been forced to assent to utter non-sense; and been told to put up with unconstitutional conduct.
The lawyers who spew forth this non=sense are either reckless, or they're stupid. Either way, there's a real question as to how these attorneys got their licenses, can remain attorneys, and why we should believe they are serious about their oath to the US Constitution.
They've spewed froth non-sense. Their legal arguments make no sense. But what's worse is that Americans are just rolling over saying, "Wow, an attorney said we have to burn the Constitution."
Lazy Americans. You cannot keep what you are not willing to protect, even from the disease inside the ABA.
The American Bar Association and their reckless lawyers inside the DoJ have created this legal mess. It's time Americans tell the ABA we're setting up a new system, one that will compete with, and directly-lawfully target, those attorneys who have perpetuated this mess.
Americans are being told we have to put up with this. It's time to reciprocate to the Attorneys: You're going to put up with the Constitution, even if that means you're disbarred.
Time to wake up America. This legal community is worthless, and they have twisted the laws to require you to embrace this legal non-sense.
They have failed. They have failed their oath. They are reckless. They are not to be trusted. They should be disbarred and forever prevented from spewing forth any more legal non-sense, or compelling anyone to take them seriously.
<< Home