President's OPM staff whines about Michael Moore

Washington insiders are whispering, "what have we heard" -- Speaking of inside comments about people -- Drudge got an e-mail about what someone said about the president.

I saw this lovely note from ABC about "Bush makes me sick." But do you want the other side of the story -- to know what the President's staff is saying?

Have you ever checked the computers of the President's Office? You might want to do that and find out what his staff is doing.

President's staff is on wikis making comments about those who report the facts about 9-11: Michael Moore

If only you knew what was going on inside OPM.

* * *

We know ABC thinks the President is a goof. You want to know how the Office of Personnel Management looks at things? You need only look at what they openly say about Michael More.

A. What they said

President's OPM Office reports: "Michael Moore is a fat worthless nothing"

Here's the wiki update, linked to the President's office: [ Click ]

B. Who they are

Here's the info on the Office of Personnel Management: [ Click ]

Here's the net block for OPM:
US Office of Personnel Management USOPM-188-21 (NET-205-131-188-0-1)
205.131.188.0 - 205.131.189.255

Note: It matches the net block for the Wiki Update: 205.131.188.5

-- that's what they added to the wiki. Ask them about it.

Talk about national priorities!

Same thing is going on at NCIS and DOJ -- completely undermining confidence there are "big investigations" about the NSA and war crimes.

Same thing going on in Navy's criminal investigation shop, and the DoJ area -- we were told they were "too busy" to look into the FISA violations and war crimes. But they have enough time to update wikis?

What's up with that? Maybe the lazy Congressional staffers will ask the various DoD and DoJ and OPM auditors to review time cards and use of personal computers: How much time are they spending doing "non work related business" -- and do we really have any manning shortfall to justify violating FISA and laws of war?

You'd think Gonzalez would have a really good excuse for the Senate Judiciary Committee: "Hay, we can't comply with FISA because well. . .we're busy making comments on wikis. And that is really hard."

They have enough time to update wikis, but not enough time to follow FISA or the laws of war. Make you wonder who in DC has their head up their ass.

One person, among many: Mr. Clown boy, George Bush. Has Laura threatened to leave him again over alcohol use?

* * *

Does Bush make you sick? I should think so -- their fat asses in OPM don't have enough to do, and like to update wikis complaining about people that are supposedly "irrelevant."

Here's are some questions for OPM and POTUS:

A. Is Michael Moore that upsetting to you?

B. Why are you spending time on Wiki updates, not reading the Constitution?

C. After the disaster in Katrina and Iraq, why bothering with "little old" Michael?

The answer is: Bush makes us all sick. He's a war criminal and should be impeached.

And the Entire Executive Branch knows it -- or they have their head up their ass.

Fitzgerald is still investigating those idiot-boys Libby and Rove. How you liking that?

Same kind of non-sense is going on over at the NAVY's criminal investigative service and the DoJ office of legislative affairs and general counsel's office: Spending time on non-official matters. Check their IT logs on what they're surfing for during officer hours. Whole lot of them know they're what's going on.

Now you have to wonder how was all this done without the NSA being able to track it?

Wake up! The idiots inside NSA are stupid and will do what they're told, even violate the law.

* * *

Wiki update: President Bush is a fat worthless nothing . . .


* * *

Here's the information from the Wiki:

Revision as of 06:53, 12 January 2006
69.254.230.103 (Talk)
(→1970s)
← Older edit Revision as of 14:29, 12 January 2006
205.131.188.5 (Talk)

Newer edit →
Line 366: Line 366:
==Notes== ==Notes==
#{{noteage}} The other is the British [[Conservative Party (UK)Conservative Party]], which is older if you consider its origins in the older [[ToriesTory Party]] founded in about [[1680]]. #{{noteage}} The other is the British [[Conservative Party (UK)Conservative Party]], which is older if you consider its origins in the older [[ToriesTory Party]] founded in about [[1680]].
- # {{note1}} [[Michael Moore]], ''[[Stupid White MenStupid White Men (And Other Sorry Excuses for the State of the Nation)]]'', Chapter Ten, Regan Books. ISBN 0-06-039245-2 + # {{note1}} [[Michael Moore is a fat worthless nothing]], ''[[Stupid White MenStupid White Men (And Other Sorry Excuses for the State of the Nation)]]'', Chapter Ten, Regan Books. ISBN 0-06-039245-2
# {{note2}} [[Ari Melber]], ''Seattle Post-Intelligencer'', [[26 March]] [[2005]], [http://www.alternet.org/story/21601/ "Where's the Party At?"]. ''The Nation'', [[2 August]] [[2004]], [http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040802&s=forum "A People's Democratic Platform."] # {{note2}} [[Ari Melber]], ''Seattle Post-Intelligencer'', [[26 March]] [[2005]], [http://www.alternet.org/story/21601/ "Where's the Party At?"]. ''The Nation'', [[2 August]] [[2004]], [http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040802&s=forum "A People's Democratic Platform."]
# {{note3}} [[Al Franken]] and [[Tom Wolffe]], ''Rolling Stone'', [[17 November]] [[2004]], [http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/_/id/6635609 "The Aftermath"]. Thomas Frank, ''New York Review of Books'' vol. 52 #8, [[May 12]] [[2005]], [http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17982 "What's the Matter with Liberals?"] # {{note3}} [[Al Franken]] and [[Tom Wolffe]], ''Rolling Stone'', [[17 November]] [[2004]], [http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/_/id/6635609 "The Aftermath"]. Thomas Frank, ''New York Review of Books'' vol. 52 #8, [[May 12]] [[2005]], [http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17982 "What's the Matter with Liberals?"]