American media openly brags of supporting abuse against American civilians
In re Jared Paul Stern
What's worse than a war criminal in the White House?
It's an American media that is fully prepared to support illegal use of military force against Americans; then smear those who dare speak out about what is going on.
Let's play a game. Who said this:
"We know how to destroy people . . . It's what we do. We do it without creating liability. That's our specialty."
This person sounds like they're with a group, that there is an organized effort underway. What could this possibly be?
Who else do you know who might be committing crimes, abusing others, and acting like they're something that they're not?
You decide: Pick from the following list -- There may or may not be a correct answer:
A. Saddam Hussein
B. George Bush
C. NSA, CIA, or DoD propaganda
C. Blogger with an attitude, that hypes non-sense
D. Congressman under federal investigation
E. Former prosecutor turned blogger [ click ]
F. A helpless blog troll who whines for help, then smears others who attempt to assist click
G. Hollywood movie producer turned whiny blogger Click
H. Blogger that can't make it as an actor or government employee, so makes a committee that nobody listens to
I. An American citizen exercising their right to free speech
Give up?
It's someone we all know well: A reporter.
His name is Jared Paul Stern.
He was caught on tape. The FBI was video recording him.
Let's talk about issues.
1. Reporters knowingly engaging in smearing, with the objective of doing so without any liability. That needs some jurisprudence. In other words, the idea of the law is to prevent abusive conduct.
2. Media as a tool for information, or control. Is the media really serving the public, or is it "serving them up" with the latest information campaigns from DoD's Joint Staff. The reason they have the Smith Act is to avoid manipulations for war. If the US media supports illegally using US combat troops against American civilians -- and a war crime -- can they be found guilty of war crimes for inciting illegal behavior? That seems like a reasonable conclusion.
Wake up time for the American media. You need to stop your abuse. Otherwise you support this illegal rebellion.
Do you wish to have the same -- abusive conduct -- directed at you? That is not very nice of you. You started this.
Under the laws of war, if you violate a "norm of civilized society" -- as you state that you do -- then We the People may lawfully ignore the same rules you ignore, and fail to enforce. Is this your idea of a "civilized society"?
Thank you for being transparent.
So who's really being used: The public that is the target of the abuse; or the reporter who feigns they are being used?
Put this on your list of people who have a warped sense of reality: [ Click ]
You be the copywriter
Let's play a game: It's called "rewrite the copy to more accurately reflect the real risks of interacting with Americans."
Now, given what's been reported in the Page Six Inquiry, and the allegations that Stern's been caught on tape allegedly engaging in alleged extortion, how would you rewrite that? Take your pick, be creative, and remember what they have done to Americans: ""We know how to destroy people . . . It's what we do. We do it without creating liability. That's our specialty."
Discussion
1. Given that Stern has already destroyed himself, what fear is there of Americans having any liability for commenting on this alleged extortion caught on tape, and has now been transcribed to state, "We know how to destroy people."
2. Given Stern has been caught on tape stating that that is "what we do," does this really mean that Americans -- when you buy products that are advertised -- are actually making purchases that go toward destroying the very customers and leaders who use this information?
3. Given Stern has been recorded on tape engaging in alleged extortion -- as reported by the FBI, and on the transcripts -- how does Stern propose to get out of this without any liability?
Rewrite: You be the gossop writer about Jared Paul Stern
Start with this
Here's the quote to rewrite:
"Jared Paul Stern is devoted to making high-quality clothing for men and women in adventurous colors with a unique prep-punk sensibility." From [ this link. ]
Here are the criteria:
- A. Must be possible, but does not have to be accurate, just close enough;
- B. Has to be linked to his work in the fashion industry, but must include the latest revelations related to his alleged distortion and alleged evil-ness;
- C. Must incorpoate what is now known about the American media -- and how they allegedly destroy people -- into public statements related to the clothing industry;
- D. Under the rule of reciprocity, anything with Jared Paul Stern is alleged to have violated may be incorporated into the narrative of other things he may have also violated in other situations.
Let's try!
Jared Paul Stern is allegedly under investigation for engaging in alleged extortion. He used to have a fine reputation, but openly bragged -- and was recorded on tape -- saying that the reporters in America like to destroy people. Stern was once devoted to making high-quality clothing for men and women in adventurous colors with a unique prep-punk sensibility. Now Stern's clothing is considered by some who have witnessed his alleged extortion -- and learned of his comments about destroying people -- to be worthless. Now at least one of Stern's former readers consider his clothing to be something that is merely the product of someone who engages in illegal conduct. It is a shame that Mr Stern allegedly actively brags that they like abusing others, then getting them to buy his products. Wow, he's really impressive. Maybe he could get a job working with the Department of Defense Central Command making propaganda that violates the Smith Act. Is Stern sensible? Hay, he makes clothes that he says are sensible, too bad he makes comments that are allegedly criminal. Will Stern be back, like Martha Stewart raring to go? Of course, he'll simply find some new people to allegedly extort, and some idiot on Wall Street will loan him some more money. Let's hope Jared doesn't piss off someone else, and they're recording his every move. You know, those same war criminals who supported the illegal invasion of Iraq -- they'll likely be crawling to support someone else who's willing to be abusive. We know in America, it's only the strong survive. But it's the stupid who live longer. If you can't make it in America with talent, Stern shows us that you may have to smear others and then allegedly extort them if they refuse to buckle under. While you're at it, buy a buckle! Sterns future may be in the food business, cutting salsa tomatoes for prisoners. Before that happens, ask, "Is that the kind of person you want to hire as your waiter?" Be my guest, for all we know Stern's got some curlers, and is ready for his prison picture. Who's your daddy going to be in prison, Stern? I heard the Department of Justice turns their back when there are investigations related to plungers and small orifices. You know anything about that, or are you just too busy finding more targets to allegedly extort? Wow, let's hope you don't change your name. Guess who's going to be there? |
You try!
Jared Paul Stern, the alleged extortioner
"We know how to destroy people . . . It's what we do. We do it without creating liability. That's our specialty."
But what happens when they destroy themselves, who's going to do the "destroying job" of those who are not longer in "the business"?
Does this mean -- now that Jared is no longer "in the business -- that he should reasonably expect to be the very target of what he's said he does to others: Destroyed without there being liability?
If this is true, isn't Jared asking for others to do to him what he's done to others?
And if this is "such a fund, special thing" wouldn't it be reasonable to expect that Jared is likely the target of such an effort?
Let's consider a sample Jared writing
After you read the following two narratives, write an essay related to one of the follow three topics. Share it with your friends on the internet or a blog.
Rewrite Jared's Old Work
Let's imagine: What might Jared have actually said back then when he wrote the article -- what things might the Post Have edited out.
This is a game called "Rewrite Jared's Old Work." It's simple. All you have to do is
Sample
The following has been rewritten based on what Jared wrote about the "Mile High Club" and Trump, but has been repurposed for Jared's big tale.
Two key qustions:
[Note: The following is made up, and an entry for the contest of "Rewrite Jared's Old Work" ]
Hamptons Heat Wave: Disclamer Jared may not have actually been thinking the above. We have no idea. This is merely speculation. That's allowed in America when discussing public figures -- stinky, septic-smelling reporters lake Jared -- who like to extort American civilians. So much for exporting American values, Jared! You like the free press? Maybe you should use it for good, than evil. Now the world knows: You are eeeee----viLLLLLLLLLLL. Jared: Alleged extortioner. $200,000! Was that not enough? Why did you stop there? Why not get BILLIONS OF TRILLIONS? |
You'll notice the above version substsantially expands on Jared's orginal text. We openly admit all the first sentences in each of the above are largely what Jared has written. In fact, in the real world -- if this weren't entertainment -- it might be called plagiarism. But we're not taking credit for it.
We're simply grinding Jared's nose into the ground by asking, "Jared, what were you thinking?"
For your reerence, convenience, entertainment, here is what Jared actually wrote:
The version Jared convinced them to go with Which version do you like better? Hamptons Heat Wave: |
Disclaimer: The above information may or may not be true. Jared is too good of a smearer. What lessons will he learn from Martha Stewart’s diaries; and who will be his probation officer? We're ready for that: Three cheers for Stanton.
Source: of quote, where Jared the alleged extortioner admits to smearing others without liability. April 8, 2006 In Page Six Inquiry, Gossip Swirls Around Gossips
By CAMPBELL ROBERTSON, ALLISON HOPE WEINER and WILLIAM K. RASHBAUM
Shocked!
<< Home